meotsuburu wrote:nanimoshiranaihito, you should have been fixing your mistakes since the very beginning instead of defending them. As you seem obdurate to reason, I don't see the point in posting any more. If you feel it's important, post away.
If you have free time to be worried about other peoples' mistakes you should use it to think about your own. You said you would appreciate it if people would be kind enough to point out some of your mistakes, well I'm going to be extra kind now.
meotsuburu wrote:Feminism is not a theory to be proven or disproven, it is a philosophy.
I don't need you to tell me what feminism is, and while it itself is not a theory, simone's “One is not born to be a man/woman. One becomes ONE.” is a theory that has been disproven. Learn to read more than just two words, it will be very useful for you.
metsuburu wrote:I am 100% wrong, but you agree TV influences us.
I also never said "cause" I said 'educate.' And from what I am saying, (READING COMPREHENSION ASSISTANCE) is that Dramas do not exclusively entertain us.
Please show me exactly where I wrote that "you are 100% wrong". That entire post had absolutely nothing to do with you, it was a reply to someone else who quoted a person who said "One is not born to be a man/woman. One becomes ONE." A reasonable assumption is that this person believes that men and women are not different inherently, and are made different by media and conditioning, which scientists proved is wrong (this is my opinion, if you don't believe in the evidence scientists gave that is a different story). I never said the media and conditioning do not affect us at all, in fact I said that they EXACERBATES WHAT'S ALREADY THERE (I can use big words too).
Also where the hell did I write that you said "cause"? Dude, seriously you're not that important, not every post I make is about you, before you make such ridiculous claims, read who the post is replying to.
meotruburu wrote:Innate feelings are inane as well.
Oh are they now, I can find about a million scientists who would disagree with you, I could continue on about how that claim is ridiculous, but unlike you I ACTUALLY READ MORE THAN A WORD. I read the words that come after the sentence, used this little thing called common sense to see that the next paragraph (BTW grammar whore, the next two sentences should be in the same paragraph) is connected with this one, so lets see what it says.
meotsuburu wrote:Innate feelings are inane as well.
Feelings are temporal. We are born with a body: head, arms, hands, legs, and feet. If all shows reflect what we want based on what we were born with, it would be nothing as the body wants nothing (and needs nourishment).
I see; head, arms, legs and feet (no comma before the "and"). Wow, from science class I could've sworn we were born with a couple more things. From what I remember it was the nervous system, digestive system, circulatory system and many others including the endocrine system, which secretes hormones, which have been proven to affect the way we act, cause desires and some regulations. Hmm, I guess I was wrong, we were only born with the head, arms, hands, legs and feet. And yes those things do not desire anything.
meotsuburu wrote:"Not your fault" excuses. Feminists and other losers are the underdog. The losers that escaped religious persecution sailed to the New World and are now called Pilgrims. The losers that escaped civil persecution and ran to the North are now called Runaway Slaves.
So you say Feminism is rediculous and crap. I, myself, do not agree with every word and letter but it is nice how you've label the two together.
Ummmmm where did I say feminism is crap? I said that the quote by simone (read above) is feminist crap. Also it's very nice that you know third grade history, but I suggest instead of wasting your time with that, you pick up a grammar book (since you're such a grammar lover) and learn what present tense writing is. And if you can't do that pick up a dictionary and learn what the word "Nowadays" means-oh wait I forgot, you can't do that because that would mean you *gasps* might have to read more than one sentence! You might even have to read a *double gasps* FULL PARAGRAPH!! Why the hell are you bringing up **** from 300-400 years ago when I'm clearly talking about events going on nowadays?
And a little insite to your "knowledge of history" (BTW I know since you probably don't get this, but that was sarcasm), well ... it's off. First off even though the pilgrims escaped persecution from england, they themselves persecuted other religions more than anyone else. Yes they wanted religious freedom for themselves, but they didn't allow others religious freedom. Are they winners in your book?
And those that escaped civil persecution are now know as runaway slaves huh (sarcasm again). So the Irish, the Jews, the southern white trash, and pretty much anyone who wasn't an anglo-saxon protestant landowner was a runaway slave huh. Wow, I never knew that. I always thought that Slaves who ran away from their masters were known as runaway slaves. But it turns out it was anyone who escaped from civil persecution from the south and entered the civil persecution in north that was a runaway slave. Hmmm, thanks for that info. (sarcasm once again)
dumbass wrote:Above is addressed to AboutDrama.
Dumbass, I think she/he would know that it was addressed to him/her. Why? Because THE ENTIRE POST WAS ADDRESSED TO HIM/HER. How does he/she know it? Because it was in a reply to his/her post.
You on the other hand seem to think that all my posts are directed towards you. Why? Because you're a dumbass who can't seem to read more than a sentence, that's why.
Next time learn to reply to posts that are directed towards you.
meotsuburu wrote:Never said a company's purpose was to be sweet or generous. And the by-product/side effect of a lesson learned is your concession that dramas do not exclusively entertain us.
As for its application in real life, (again) not everything is gold.
OMG, can it be? You replied to a post that was actually directed towards you!!! Congrats. Now please show me where I said that you believe the purpose of a company is to be sweet or generous?
Also please show me where I said Dramas "exclusively" entertain us? Obviously you need to learn the meaning of the word "purpose", you vocabulary school reject. I said that the "purpose" for companies is to make money, and imo our "purpose" for watching dramas should be entertainment only. Also, I said imo anyone who makes it their "purpose" to learn something from a drama (learn the meaning of the word "tries") is a retard. That is my opinion, if someone thinks it was harsh, then sorry. I never however said that it is impossible to learn something from a drama. It's a ridiculous statement because you can learn something from anything. You can learn something from taking a **** even. Hopefully, a by-product here was that you learned to read an entire paragraph before posting crap.
meotsuburu wrote:You cannot understand how I thought you believe killers are created by video games and TV because I never said you did (I addressed the remark, not the person). I misconstrue as you miscommunicate.
Oh really? You never said that did you?
meotsuburu wrote:TV and violent video games cause killers? A killer is a person who kills. TV and violent video games do not cause people at all. And where does this conclusion come from? If I do believe something, I will say so myself! I do not need you to tell me what I do or do not believe. Do put words into my mouth so you can argue with yourself.
Hmm, according to this, YOU DID! And what the hell does that last sentence mean anyway? You want me to put words in your mouth so I can argue with myself? ummm yeah ... for someone who criticizes others for minor mistakes, you sure do make a lot of them yourself. Anyway, you want me to put words in your mouth, no problem.
*me putting words in your mouth* "I can't read a paragraph for ****, and apparently I can't write one either, yet for some reason I feel it necessary to look through other peoples posts, find insignificant grammar, vocab etc errors and start giving them **** about it".
I'm so glad you decided to stop posting, it saves me a headache trying to decipher the crap you write and where you get ideas for your crap as well, but just in case you do deicde to post again
1) read the entire post, if you're too stupid to do that, read an entire paragraph before replying, if you're too stupid to do that ... I really feel sorry for you.
2) Learn to reply to posts that are directed to you. If it's not directed at you and you want to reply to it, fine, just don't start connecting it to yourself. You're not important, and I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote it.
3) stop being such a grammar ****. Not every sentence can be perfect, stop picking out small sentences that might look fragmanted and start giving me **** about it. It is impossible to get a point across in one sentence, that's why sentences are put together to form paragraphs. Also, it's not always easy to get your point across from paragraphs, that's why paragraphs are put together to form posts. If you try hard enough you can find mistakes with any one single sentence.
4) using big words does not make you cool. We all have a dictionary and thesaurus, we can all do it.