http://d-addicts.com
 
Register
 
HOME TORRENT DRAMA WIKI STATS HELP (FAQ) SEARCH GROUPS PROFILE PRIVATE MESSAGES LOGIN
      

Suggestions and Small Announcements For Improving D-Addicts

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 64, 65, 66  Next
Jump to page:

 
Reply to topic    D-Addicts Forum Index -> D-Addicts Announcements
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
RuroshinOffline
Avatar

Site Admin
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Total posts: 2747
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:41 am    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

jianwa wrote:
This time around Ruro, SIZE DOES NOT MATTER Laugh because FSS is a closed board. If they were open, the size might be close to d-addicts or bigger.


That was my point, if FSS was an open system and grew to d-addicts or bigger size they will not get the same seeder / leecher ratio, as seen by jpopsuki who implements an open ratio system, is about as big as d-addicts but can't quite obtain a high ratio of seeders / leechers. FSS works because its a close system, I do not want d-addicts to become a close system.


Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
jianwaOffline
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Total posts: 394
Location: NorCali
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:31 am    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

Ruroshin wrote:
jianwa wrote:
This time around Ruro, SIZE DOES NOT MATTER Laugh because FSS is a closed board. If they were open, the size might be close to d-addicts or bigger.


That was my point, if FSS was an open system and grew to d-addicts or bigger size they will not get the same seeder / leecher ratio, as seen by jpopsuki who implements an open ratio system, is about as big as d-addicts but can't quite obtain a high ratio of seeders / leechers. FSS works because its a close system, I do not want d-addicts to become a close system.


Yeah the chance of them having not the same amount seeder/leecher ratio will most likely be true. BUT I still believe they would have close to 50% ratio compared with d-addicts 26% stats. So having some type of ratio would work.
Back to top
View user's profile 
RuroshinOffline
Avatar

Site Admin
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Total posts: 2747
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:18 am    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

jianwa wrote:

Yeah the chance of them having not the same amount seeder/leecher ratio will most likely be true. BUT I still believe they would have close to 50% ratio compared with d-addicts 26% stats. So having some type of ratio would work.


Unfortunately the difference between believing something will be true and reality is sometime quite large. pinch All I'm hearing is it "might work" and what I'm seeing is "doesn't quite work as well as we like". Changing to a ratio system at this point in time given d-addicts current size is non-trivial so I need a little bit more convincing than that.

Right, here's the challenge. Can somebody show me a tracker site that has over 4,000 torrents and 20,000 peers at any point in time or approximately 200,000 users (we have 20,000 registered users and about 10 times that amount that uses the tracker) uses a ratio system and is open to the public (meaning anybody can register and download). Preferably dealing with asian entertainment and has over 50% seeders to leechers ratio.

The closest I've seen is boxtorrent.
Their stats:
users 211,927
torrents 1,,894
peers 60,519
seeders 17,732
leechers 42,787
ratio 41%

close but not quite and this is from an anime community that has lots of techy ppl that is very good with seeding. If you factor in that the drama community is less tech savory you can predict the result.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
odino
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 6:31 am    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

tikleabubble wrote:
it doesn't take much to change those things. For people who don't stick to one preference, it'll be a pain to have to change around all the time anyway, so same difference.


yeah erm how about not setting a preference if you don't wish to eh? Blink Well thanks Ruroshin for the saving option, I am looking forward to it. At times I missed a show due to clutter of the torrents page. For somebody like me who only watches one type of drama this is really helpful.

By the way my take on the ratio system is that if the limit is too strict then it discourages downloading, especially for older files. You may never get your ratio right if there are no leechers for the file. Private torrent sites usually have lots of seeders for files but nobody is downloading.

But how about keeping a ratio system but it only affects new releases. So in the first 24 hours only people who have 1:1 ratio or higher can download. Just an idea to play around with.

I usually get a 1.000 ratio by default for each file. Sometimes it's lower and sometimes it's higher.
Back to top
View user's profile 
jholicOffline
Site Admin
Joined: 03 Feb 2004
Total posts: 6192
Location: missin' hawaii
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:47 am    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

first of all, thanks for starting this thread, Ruro! we're always looking for ways to improve.

secondly, let's not turn this thread into a "make d-addicts a ratio site" debate. we already have a thread for that: A Ratio-Based Tracker (Banning Leechers)

but as Ruro mentioned, i have also seen the advantages AND disadvantages of having a ratio tracker. others may have seen that i have also suggested mandating a .30 to .50 share ratio. but that also invites a lot of controversy.

ironically, ratio sites are not without their own share of controversy. i just skimmed through several pages of a thread at FSS ("Where do we draw the line...."). members brought up great points and interesting perspectives into maintaining the ratio site.

to me, it is asking A LOT of Ruro to convert d-addicts over, and are the benefits worth it? it's hard to say. i still say a very effective method is EDUCATION. keep spreading this message: sharing keeps bittorrent alive!

do you enjoy getting this for free? well, then just share it. seed others, and others will seed you. it's not about the greed .... it's about the seed.

_________________
Use THUMBS UP/DOWN buttons to KEEP or DELETE posts.
If you see SPAM or ABUSE, use the REPORT button.
Back to top
View user's profile 
jianwaOffline
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Total posts: 394
Location: NorCali
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:10 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

jholic wrote:

but that also invites a lot of controversy.

ironically, ratio sites are not without their own share of controversy. i just skimmed through several pages of a thread at FSS ("Where do we draw the line...."). members brought up great points and interesting perspectives into maintaining the ratio site.

to me, it is asking A LOT of Ruro to convert d-addicts over, and are the benefits worth it? it's hard to say. i still say a very effective method is EDUCATION. keep spreading this message: sharing keeps bittorrent alive!



Agree on inviting controversy. This will be my last ratio comment.

FSS discussion, they keep a 1:1 like ratio which is strict. But for d-addicts, it should really be relaxed to like their is no ratio like around 1:4. Maybe find a way to add user participation count toward increasing the ratio??? Educating does not work all the time? Do we read all the manuals that comes with the electronic device? No, we just open and press buttons. I just think we should implement a VERY RELAXED ratio system.

It sends a message, "You may download a lot, but there is a limit we can take from you leeching all the time." Of course, I don't believe leechers should be banned at all. Just don't let them download.

That's all. ZZZZZZzzzzz.....should I check grammer/spelling? Naaaah! Smile
Back to top
View user's profile 
RomanceOffline
Joined: 18 Jun 2005
Total posts: 689
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:21 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

A ratio would make LOADS of people leave this board and try to find the files elswhere, or something, believe me, it might sound dumb as its their own fault and yeahyeah, but wtf its good as it is now.new people are registrating everyday and the dramas are spread

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile 
groink
Avatar

Upload Addict
Location: Hawaii
Age: 41
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:45 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

Romance wrote:
A ratio would make LOADS of people leave this board and try to find the files elswhere, or something, believe me, it might sound dumb as its their own fault and yeahyeah, but wtf its good as it is now.new people are registrating everyday and the dramas are spread

I'm already seeing this trend... Can you say "Clubbox"????? IMHO, other client/server services like Clubbox is more of a "f**k you P2P" statement than just an alternative way of obtaining content.

--- groink
Back to top
View user's profile Visit poster's website 
RuroshinOffline
Avatar

Site Admin
Joined: 05 Dec 2003
Total posts: 2747
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 11:48 am    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

you can save your preference for the custom tab now if you're logged in.
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
Atomic
Avatar

Location: Toronto/Manila
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:03 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

Howbout forcing all guests to register in order to download torrents? I'm not saying it'd help out in seeding ratio, but at least they should thank the people who upload the new dramas or translate the dramas..
In total there are 140 users online :: 24 Registered, 4 Hidden and 112 Guests ... Stats 5 minutes ago.
Back to top
View user's profile 
odino
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 1:30 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

Why force somebody to register, they would still just be idle in the forum. If you have more than just "they should thank the people who upload" it might be worth considering.
Back to top
View user's profile 
ToreiOffline
Joined: 23 Mar 2005
Total posts: 7
Location: Kyoto, Japan
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:02 pm    Post subject: Other Suggested Improvements   Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

It would be very interesting to see what other people are watching in a statistical kind of way (OK, I've searched around and maybe I've missed the fact that this feature exists already). But, It would be great if the stats were a bit more comprehensive in this area. For example, it is obvious that jdrama is popular but which one series is the most popular?

Of course, the problem is that d/l stat do not necessarily equal popularly or even what people would recommend. So, although there is a great system already to vote for your series of the week, maybe a rating system like jdorama has would be helpful. Or if nothing else, make the link to the SOTW more accessible.

Finally, amazon.com has a great feature that I am not so sure that could be implemented easily but... recommendations. As you looking at your new favorite series, somewhere on the page could be a list of likely recommendations for your next series. This could be by actor (so, if you like "Love Generation" then maybe "Hero" would be recommended because it also has Takuya Kimura and Takako Matsu.) Or by topic (so, then "Tokyo Love Story" might be recommended because of the office romance theme.) As I think about this, it seems more of a feature for a database format like WikiDrama than a forum format... So, I hope it OK to post this idea here. (^-^)v

OK, now that I've typed it, my ideas sound like a lot of work for somebody but IMHO it would be a great help for those looking for a new series to watch.
Back to top
View user's profile 
iceberriOffline
Moderator
Joined: 18 Jan 2004
Total posts: 1538
Location: New Jersey
Gender: Female
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 2:14 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

^ I think Torei has some excellent ideas. I'm not sure how difficult this would be to implement code-wise Ruro, but if it can be easily implemented, I would like to see a more integrated rating system/database system. I know we have wikidrama, but it has a more general summary description about the drama than ratings. We did start with the review sections and discussion threads, but since it requires a person to set up a poll/rating system for every single drama series, it's not employed as often as I'd like to see. If it could be something that would be "automagically" Wink created everytime a torrent of every drama's episode 1 was uploaded (or an dropdown menu option to create such a feature on the upload torrent page?) and added maybe to the torrent stats page(?) that would definitely help promote the ratings system, I think.

Again, dunno how difficult this is to implement. I know you already have a lot on your plate as is, but you asked for it! Tongue Just branching out from some of Torei's ideas, but as an inexperienced programmer, I really don't know very much. ^^;;;;

_________________
Back to top
View user's profile 
animetama
Avatar

Location: Brisbane
Gender: Female
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:07 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

^
Would it be feasible to have a "rate it" drop down button (1-5 or 1-10 stars) next to the dl link in the torrent page/thread.. then on completion of the series, an aggregate of the votes are "automagically" generated to give the series an overall score based on these votes..?

Since there is already a list of links for seed requests, maybe these can be linked somehow for discussion and/or seed requests..?

hmm.. or should that be automagically inputed into wiki-drama somehow to encourage people to visit wiki-drama more..?

/my 2cents
Smile

_________________

    Q12. The first thing you saw when you woke up in the morning?
    YC: Jaejoong... JJ: Yoochun...
    <33333
Back to top
View user's profile Send e-mail Visit poster's website 
jianwaOffline
Joined: 13 Apr 2004
Total posts: 394
Location: NorCali
Gender: Male
PostPosted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:11 pm    Post subject:    Post Rating: 0 Reply with quote

For Top 10 Torrents requiring seeding

There should be a button to let you see more more than just the top 10 torrents need seeding. It should go up to top 50 torrents?
Back to top
View user's profile 
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    D-Addicts Forum Index -> D-Addicts Announcements All times are GMT - 1 Hours
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 64, 65, 66  Next
Jump to page:
Page 3 of 66
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum